Relación entre la estrategia de innovación de la firma y su decisión de patentar: evidencia de empresas pertenecientes al sector manufacturero colombiano

  • Jorge Luís Juliao Rossi Docente e Investigador, Facultad de Ciencias Administrativas y Contables, Universidad de La Salle, Bogotá, Colombia
  • Fernando Barrios Aguirre Docente e investigador, Facultad de Economía de la Universidad Jorge Tadeo Lozano, Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Jana Schmutzler Docente, Facultad de Administración, Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia
  • Iván Darío Sánchez Manchola Profesor Asistente, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativas, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
Palabras clave: Colombia, Estrategia de Innovación, Patente, Propiedad Intelectual, Fuentes de Información

Resumen

El objetivo del presente artículo es determinar los efectos que ejercen la apuesta estratégica de innovación de las empresas manufactureras colombianas sobre la decisión de proteger sus innovaciones con registro de propiedad intelectual (patentes). Para lo anterior se utilizó un Zero Inflated Poisson Model (ZIP) sobre datos provenientes de la Segunda y Tercera Encuesta de Desarrollo e Innovación Tecnológica efectuada por DANE-DNP-COLCIENCIAS (EDIT-II y III). Los resultados de esta investigación evidencian una relación negativa entre la proporción de inversión en I+D y la decisión de patentar. Adicionalmente, el bajo nivel de patentes se debe en parte a la carencia de relaciones de calidad de las firmas con proveedores y competencia.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Biografía del autor/a

Jorge Luís Juliao Rossi, Docente e Investigador, Facultad de Ciencias Administrativas y Contables, Universidad de La Salle, Bogotá, Colombia

Citas

Aboites, J. y Dutrénit, G. (2003). Innovación, aprendizaje y creación de capacidades tecnológicas. México: Editorial Miguel Ángel Porrúa.

Alcorta, L. y Peres, W. (1995). Innovation systems and technological specialization in Latin America and the Caribbean. Discussion Paper Series 9509. ECLAC/UNDP Regional Project RLA/88/039. United Nations University/Institute for New Technologies. [Consultado 12 Feb 2011]. Disponible en: http://ideas.repec.org/p/dgr/unuint/199509.html

Amara, N. y Landry, R. (2005). Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms: evidence from the 1999 statistics Canada innovation survey. Technovation, 25, 245-259.

Amara, N., Landry, R., Becheikhb, N. y Ouimet, M. (2008). Learning and novelty of innovation in established manufacturing SMEs. Techovation, 28, 450-463.

Arrow, K.J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29, 155-173.

Arundel, A. y Kabla, I. (1998). What percentage of innovations are patented? Empirical estimates for European firms. Research Policy, 27, 127-141.

Barney, J. (2007). Resource bases theory. Nueva York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Becker, M. (2004). Organizational routines: a review of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13, 643-677.

Belderbos, R., Carree, M. y Lokshin, B. (2004). Co-operative R&D and firm performance. Research Policy, 33, 1477-1492.

Beugelsdijk, S. y Cornet, M. (2002). A far friend is worth more than a good neighbour: proximity and innovation in a small country. Journal of Management and Governance, 6, 169-188.

Bierly, P. y Chakrabarti, A. (1996). Generic knowledge strategies in the US pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 123-135.

Blind, K., Cremers, K. y Mueller, E. (2009). The influence of strategic patenting on companies' patent portfolios. Research Policy, 38, 428-436.

Blind K., Edler, J., Frietsch, R. y Schmoch, U. (2006). Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany. Research Policy, 35, 655-672.

Blomqvist, K. y Levy, J. (2006). Collaboration capability - a focal concept in knowledge creation and collaborative innovation in networks. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 2, 31.

Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29, 627-655.

Brouwer, E. y Kleinknecht, A. (1999). Innovative output, and a firm's propensity to patent An exploration of CIS micro data. Research Policy, 28, 615-624.

Caloghirou, Y., Kastelli, I. y Tsakanikas, A. (2004). Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance?. Technovation, 24, 29-39.

Carayannis, E., Alexander, J. y Ioannidis, A. (2000). Leveraging knowledge, learning and innovation in forming strategic government-university-industry (GUI) R&D partnerships in the US, Germany and France. Technovation, 20, 477-488.

Carrizo, A. (2005). Supplier-buyer collaboration in new product development: Four case studies involving SMEs. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2, 5-24.

Chudnovsky, D., López, A. y Pupato, G. (2006). Innovation and productivity in developing countries: A study of Argentine manufacturing firms' behavior. Research Policy, 35, 181-342.

Chung, S. y Kim, G.M. (2003). Performance effects of partnership between manufacturers and suppliers for new product development: the supplier's standpoint. Research Policy, 32, 587-603.

Clausen, T., Pohjola, M., Sappraserty, K. y Verspagen, B. (2011). Innovation strategies as a source of persistent innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, advance access published 2 Sept 2011.

Cohen, W. y Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.

Cohen, W., Nelson, R. y Walsh, J. (1996). Approbiability conditions and why firms patent and why they do not in the American manufacturing sector. Paper presented to the Conference on New Science and Technology indicators for the Knowledge-Based Economy, OCDE, París.

Cohen, W., Nelson, R. y Walsh, J. (2000). Protecting their intellectual assets: appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). National Bureau Of Economic Research. [Consultado 1 Junio 2011]. Disponible en: http://www.nber.org/papers/w7552

Crepon, B., Duguet, E. y Mairesse, J. (1998). Research, innovation, and productivity: An econometric analysis at the firm level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 7, 115-158.

DANE-DNP-COLCIENCIAS (2005). Innovación y desarrollo tecnológico industria manufacturera: Colombia 2003-2004. DANE-DNP-COLCIENCIAS.

Danguy, J., De Rassenfosse, G. y Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2009). The R&D-patent relationship: An industry perspective. European Investment Bank Papers, 14, 170-195.

Deardorff, A.V. (1992). Welfare Effects of Global Patent Protection. Economica, 59, 35-51.

Eisenhardt, K.M. y Tabrizi, B.N. (1995). Accelerating adaptive processes: product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 84-110.

Forero, C., Corredor, S. y Forero, N. (2009). Business networks and innovation in SMEs of a developing country. Universidad de los Andes. Documento de trabajo no publicado.

Forero, C., Laureiro, D. y Marín, A. (2007). Innovation patterns and intellectual property in SMEs of a developing country. Galeras de Administración, Junio: 1-23.

Gorgoni, S. y Pietrobelli, C. (2010). Networks, knowledge flows and innovation in the Chilean meat sector. International Journal of Business Environment, 3, 159-178.

Gick, W. (2008). Little firms and big patents: A model of small-firm patent signaling center for european studies. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 17, 913-935.

Hayek, F.A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35, 519-530.

Hernández, M., Sánchez, M. y Segovia, C. (2011). Exploitation and exploration based innovations: The role of knowledge in inter-firm relationships with distributors. Technovation, 31, 203-215.

Kaufmann, A. y Todtling, F. (2001). Science-industry interaction in the process of innovation: the importance of boundary-crossing between systems. Research Policy, 30, 791-804.

Kondo, M. (1995). Dynamic analyses on the relation between R&D and patent application in Japan. Journal of Science Policy and Research Management, 10, 193-204.

Lambert, D. (1992). Zero-inflated Poisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing. Technometrics, 34, 1-14.

Landry, R., Amara, N. y Lamari, M. (2002). Does social capital determine innovation? To what extent? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 69, 681-701.

Levin, R.C., Klevorick, A.K., Nelson, R.R. y Winter, S.G. (1987). Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 3, 783-820.

Linn, T.A. (1994). Learning from the competition. Journal of Accountancy, 177, 43-46.

Long, J.S. (1997). Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependet Variables. Advanced Quantitative Techniques in the Social Sciences series. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Lööf, H. y Heshmati, A. (2002). Knowledge capital and performan a new firm level innovation study. International Journal of Production Economic, 76, 61-85.

López, A. y Orlicki, E. (2009). Who Uses the Patent System in Developing Countries? A Study of Patent Propensities in Argentina, 1992-2001. Research and Information System for Developing Countries, 151. [Consultado 25 May 2011]. Disponible en: http://www.eaber.org/intranet/documents/40/2212/

López-Claros, A., Porter, M., Sala-i-Martin, X. y Schwab, K. (2006). The Global Competitiveness Report 2006-2007: World Economic Forum. Nueva York, EE. UU.: Palgrave Macmillan.

Mahemba, C.M. y De Bruijn, E.J. (2003). Innovation activities by small and mediumsized manufacturing enterprises in Tanzania. Creativity ad Innovation Management, 12, 162-173.

Mansfield, E. (1986). Patents and innovation: an empirical study. Management Science, 32, 173-181.

McCormick, D. y Atieno, R. (2002). Linkages between small and large firms in the Kenyan food processing sector. En van Dijk, M.P. y Sandee H. (Eds.). Innovation and Small Enterprises in the Third World (p. 223-248). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

Melgar, M. y Guerrero, F. (2005). Los Siniestros en el Seguro del Automóvil: un Análisis Econométrico Aplicado. Estudios de Economía Aplicada, 23, 355-375.

Meyers, P.W. y Athaide, G.A. (1991). Strategic mutual learning between producing and buying firms during product innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 8, 155-169.

Messeni, A. (2009). University-Industry R&D Collaborations: A Joint-Patents Analysis. The DRUID Society Summer Conference. [Consultado 25 mayo 2011] .Disponible en: http://www2.druid.dk/conferences/viewpaper.php

Miotti, L. y Sachwald, F. (2003). Co-operative R&D: why, and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy, 32, 1481-1499.

Montobbio, F. (2007). Patenting Activity in Latin American and Carribean Countries. Report for the project 'Technological Management and Intellectual Property' organized by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and Economic Commission for Latin America and The Caribbean (ECLAC). Recuperado el 25 de mayo de 2011 de: http://eco.uninsubria.it/webdocenti/fmontobbio/cv/Montobbio2007wipo_draft.pdf

Nelson, R. y Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Nieto, M.J. y Santamaría, L. (2007). The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation, 27, 367-377.

Peeters, C. y Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2006). Innovation strategy and the patenting behavior of firms. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 16, 109-135.

Perez-Luño, A. y Valle-Cabrera, R. (2010). How does knowledge matter patenting inventions? Working Paper Series WP BSAD 10.01. Universidad Pablo Olavide Sevilla. [Consultado 16 Mar 2011]. Disponible en: http://ideas.repec.org/p/pab/wpbsad/10.01.html

Porter, M. (1979). How forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, March/April, 137-145.

Prodan, I. (2005). Influence of Research and Development Expenditures on Number of Patent Applications: Selected Case Studies in OECD Countries and Central Europe, 1981-2001. Applied Econometric and International Development, 4-5, 5-22.

Ray, G., Barney, J. y Muhanna, W. (2004). Capabilities, business processes and competitive advantage: choosing the dependent variable in empirical test of Resource Based View. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 23-37.

Ritter, T. y Gemunden, H.G. (2003). Network competen its impact on innovation success and its antecedents. Journal of Business Research, 56, 745-755.

Romijn, H. y Albadalejo, M. (2002). Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England. Research Policy, 31, 1053-1067.

Scherer, F.M. (1999). New perspective on economic growth and technological innovation, Washington: Brookings.

Schumpeter, J.A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Nueva York, NY: Harper Brothers.

Schwab, K. (2010). The Global Competitiveness Report 2010-2011: World Economic. Nueva York, EE. UU.: Palgrave Macmillan.

Taylor, C.T. y Silberston, Z.A. (1973). The economic impact of the patent system: a study of the British experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Teece, D. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15, 286-305.

Tether, B. (2002). Who co-operate for innovation, and why: an empirical analysis. Research Policy, 31, 947-967.

Todtling, F., Lehnera, P. y Kaufmann, A. (2009). Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions? Technovation, 29, 59-71.

Tsai, K.H. (2009). Collaborative networks and product innovation performan Toward a contingency perspective. Research Policy, 38, 765-778.

Van Ophem, H., Brouwer, E., Kleinknecht, A. y Mohnen, P. (2002). The mutual relation between patents and R&D. En: Kleinknecht A, Mohnen, P. (Eds.). Innovation and firm performan econometric explorations of survey data (p. 56-69). Nueva York: Palgrave.

Vega-Jurado, J., Gutiérrez-Gracia, A. y Fernández-de-Lucio, I. (2009). La relación entre las Estrategias de Innovación: Coexistencia o Complementariedad. Journal of technology management & innovation, 4, 74-88.

Vu, H. y Maller, R. (1996). The Likelihood Ratio Test for Poisson Versus Binomial Distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 818-824.

Vuola, O. y Hameri, A.P. (2006). Mutually benefiting joint innovation process between industry and big-science. Technovation, 26, 3-12.

Whitley, R. (2002). Developing innovative competences: the role of institutional frameworks. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 497-528.

Winter, S. (1989). Patents in complex contexts: Incentives and effectiveness. En: Weil, V. y Snapper J.W. (Eds.). Owning scientific and technical information. (p. 41-60). Londres: Rutgers University Press.

Yly-Renko, H., Autio, E. y Sapienza, H.J. (2001). Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 587-613.

Zhao, H., Tong, X., Wong, P.K. y Zhu, J. (2005). Types of technology sourcing and innovative capability: An exploratory study of Singapore manufacturing firms. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 16, 209-224.

Publicado
2013-08-14
Cómo citar
Juliao Rossi, J. L., Barrios Aguirre, F., Schmutzler, J., & Sánchez Manchola, I. D. (2013). Relación entre la estrategia de innovación de la firma y su decisión de patentar: evidencia de empresas pertenecientes al sector manufacturero colombiano. Estudios Gerenciales, 29(128), 313-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2013.09.005
Sección
Artículo de investigación